Essays are meant to be kept short, aiming at roughly 3000-3500 words. They should be written for an intelligent general audience, and so should not require any knowledge of specialist philosophical terminology or ideas in order to be understood. Authors are also asked to clarify specific terminology if such is used and to avoid lengthy footnotes. To avoid difficulties with word processing formats we kindly ask authors to save and submit their work in Word Document Format (.docx).
GENERAL LAYOUT AND STYLE GUIDELINES
The basic rule for layout of papers is to keep things simple. We do advise authors to use section divisions. Please use italics for emphasis rather than underlining or bold type. We prefer that cardinal numbers, i.e. not dates or ordinal numbers, up to 100 should be written out rather than in numerals (“ninety-nine red balloons” not “99 Red Balloons”, but “the 3rd Earl Russell died in 1970”). Lists should be numbered or lettered, not bulleted. Abbreviations should be used sparingly and should also be spelled out on their first appearance with the abbreviation following in parentheses (“Debates in Aesthetics (DIA)”).
Shorter quotes should be encased in “double quotation marks.” Quotes of three lines or longer should be separated from the main text by a line break before and after the quotation. Single quotation marks can be used when mentioning words such as ‘sloop,’ or the sentence ‘your looks longer than it is’, or as ‘scare-quotes’ to indicate technical, non-standard usage or cases where the word is being referred to as a word (i.e. the term ‘aesthetic’ has an interesting history).
Authors are asked to pay particular attention to the accuracy and correct presentation of citations. Each citation should be made in a footnote. An author-date system, including the name of the author, year and page number, should be used. For example:
Quine 1960, p. 12.
Horkheimer and Adorno 2002, p. vii; Hornback 2009, p. 52, 60.
A reference list should appear at the end of the manuscript headed ‘References’ and should include all and only those references cited in the text. Authors should use a clear and comprehensive bibliographic style. For example:
Adorno, Theodor W. (2003). Negative Dialektik: Jargon der Eigenlichkeit. Ed. by Rolf Tiedemann. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Cinthio, Giraldi. (2008). ”Gli Hecatommithi: Third Decade, Seventh Novella”. In: Othello: the Moor of Venice. Ed. by Michael Neill. Trans. by Bruno Ferraro. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 434-444.
Forbes, Graham. (2002). ‘’Intensionality.’’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volume 76.1, pp. 75-99.
Habermas, Jürgen (1982). ”The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Re-reading Dialectic of Enlightenment’’. Trans. by Thomas Y. Levin. In: New German Critique 26, pp. 13-30.
North American spelling should be Anglicized. In particular, note the preferred spellings of: analyse, behaviour, colour, defence, premiss (pl. premisses), sceptic, USA (not U.S.A.). On the question of using ‘ize’ versus ‘ise’ endings, we will follow Oxford style for the sake of uniformity. So: criticize, standardize, realize. But note: analyse, analysing, exercise. Possessives should in general follow pronunciation, so: Evans’s, Lewis’s, Williams’s.
The Oxford Dictionary for Writers and Editors DiA’s chosen authority for deciding between alternative spellings.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).